Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
We Distribute
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Hey @bonfire @mayel and crew, if you ever feel like putting a spec down to attach academic citations to #ActivityPub objects for your Open Science Network, ping me.

Hey @bonfire @mayel and crew, if you ever feel like putting a spec down to attach academic citations to #ActivityPub objects for your Open Science Network, ping me.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
activitypub
38 Posts 6 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

    @trwnh
    As a side note, I think RDFa is a great idea, I tried to use it in a document and make a markdown preprocessor to be able to use it with semantic mediawiki-style wikilinks [[predicate::object|display text]] where the document is the implicit subject, or [[subject::predicate::object]] and have those render out as a elements with RDFa. But then I learned that rdflib had dropped support and there weren't any actively developed parsers, so I gave up because I wasn't gonna write one and what's the point in writing something that can't be parsed easily.

    trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    trwnh@mastodon.social
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    @jonny depending on how things go, i might end up writing one for myself if i decide i want to use html as a canonical content format which gets converted into other serializations. i'm not particularly enamored with markdown as a canonical content format (although i recognize why many people like it) so i don't know how much energy to devote to markdown extensions if i won't end up using them

    but i still have research to do re: content modeling and management...

    trwnh@mastodon.socialT jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

      @jonny depending on how things go, i might end up writing one for myself if i decide i want to use html as a canonical content format which gets converted into other serializations. i'm not particularly enamored with markdown as a canonical content format (although i recognize why many people like it) so i don't know how much energy to devote to markdown extensions if i won't end up using them

      but i still have research to do re: content modeling and management...

      trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      trwnh@mastodon.social
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      @jonny one thing that seems potentially promising with markdown is to try to put the data in frontmatter instead of content? then when you parse frontmatter as toml/yaml/json you can basically take the json and make it json-ld by adding a context depending on the "type" of content it represents. imagine something like hugo and mapping the default frontmatter attributes to some vocabulary... then establishing equivalences as needed

      jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

        @jonny depending on how things go, i might end up writing one for myself if i decide i want to use html as a canonical content format which gets converted into other serializations. i'm not particularly enamored with markdown as a canonical content format (although i recognize why many people like it) so i don't know how much energy to devote to markdown extensions if i won't end up using them

        but i still have research to do re: content modeling and management...

        jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jonny@neuromatch.social
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        @trwnh
        Hey if you can write HTML, then dont bother with markup formats. I write code for scientists and if I were to ask a scientist to write their document in HTML they would just be like "no" and "never" lol

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

          @jonny one thing that seems potentially promising with markdown is to try to put the data in frontmatter instead of content? then when you parse frontmatter as toml/yaml/json you can basically take the json and make it json-ld by adding a context depending on the "type" of content it represents. imagine something like hugo and mapping the default frontmatter attributes to some vocabulary... then establishing equivalences as needed

          jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jonny@neuromatch.social
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          @trwnh
          There is a Jekyll plugin that does this, but one of the things I wanted with RDFa is to be able to annotate the text within the document as well as the whole document. Its a shame it seems to be quietly being deprecated

          rieyin@zirk.usR trwnh@mastodon.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

            @trwnh
            There is a Jekyll plugin that does this, but one of the things I wanted with RDFa is to be able to annotate the text within the document as well as the whole document. Its a shame it seems to be quietly being deprecated

            rieyin@zirk.usR This user is from outside of this forum
            rieyin@zirk.usR This user is from outside of this forum
            rieyin@zirk.us
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            @jonny @trwnh If you’re interested in a critical history of RDFa: https://aeshin.org/static/pubs/Shaw%20-%202022%20-%20A%20Dispute%20over%20Embedding%20Linked%20Data%20in%20Web%20Pages.c90822e73bae.pdf

            jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

              @trwnh
              There is a Jekyll plugin that does this, but one of the things I wanted with RDFa is to be able to annotate the text within the document as well as the whole document. Its a shame it seems to be quietly being deprecated

              trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
              trwnh@mastodon.social
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              @jonny yeah rdfa is mostly stuck in 2013, it never really got fully ironed out because most people already preferred turtle or the new hotness of jsonld. it's a shame because it does have some advantages that the other formats lack (namely, you can markup text *and* make some of that markup extra-semantic, write once instead of having to maintain two separate things and risk them getting out of sync

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rieyin@zirk.usR rieyin@zirk.us

                @jonny @trwnh If you’re interested in a critical history of RDFa: https://aeshin.org/static/pubs/Shaw%20-%202022%20-%20A%20Dispute%20over%20Embedding%20Linked%20Data%20in%20Web%20Pages.c90822e73bae.pdf

                jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jonny@neuromatch.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                @rieyin
                @trwnh
                I certainly am, and have done my own archaeology here, so very interested in finding an actual history

                trwnh@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jonny@neuromatch.socialJ jonny@neuromatch.social

                  @rieyin
                  @trwnh
                  I certainly am, and have done my own archaeology here, so very interested in finding an actual history

                  trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  trwnh@mastodon.social
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  @jonny @rieyin currently reading -- thanks for the link!

                  trwnh@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

                    @jonny @rieyin currently reading -- thanks for the link!

                    trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                    trwnh@mastodon.social
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    @jonny @rieyin ok whew that was a meaty read... i have a lot of notes i took that aren't suited for the mastodon format but i can say that while this is a very good paper and it helped put into words a lot of things that have been brewing in my mind for a long time, it doesn't address what happened *after* the rdfa debate at whatwg and the introduction of microdata, schema.org, open graph protocol. there's probably more at play if you consider this later time period (2010-2013??)

                    trwnh@mastodon.socialT jonny@neuromatch.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

                      @jonny @rieyin ok whew that was a meaty read... i have a lot of notes i took that aren't suited for the mastodon format but i can say that while this is a very good paper and it helped put into words a lot of things that have been brewing in my mind for a long time, it doesn't address what happened *after* the rdfa debate at whatwg and the introduction of microdata, schema.org, open graph protocol. there's probably more at play if you consider this later time period (2010-2013??)

                      trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      trwnh@mastodon.social
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      @jonny @rieyin this later time period seems to support my earlier assumption that one of the bigger reasons rdfa stagnated a bit is that it was kind of usurped by jsonld (started development in 2010) and turtle (2011 working draft)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

                        @jonny @rieyin ok whew that was a meaty read... i have a lot of notes i took that aren't suited for the mastodon format but i can say that while this is a very good paper and it helped put into words a lot of things that have been brewing in my mind for a long time, it doesn't address what happened *after* the rdfa debate at whatwg and the introduction of microdata, schema.org, open graph protocol. there's probably more at play if you consider this later time period (2010-2013??)

                        jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jonny@neuromatch.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jonny@neuromatch.social
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        @trwnh
                        @rieyin
                        I haven't had time to read yet, but you gotta cover the semtech 2011 meeting where microdata and RDF maintainers were like "we might disagree about formats, but fuck letting google decide"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups