Skip to content

ActivityPub

Focused discussion related to ActivityPub integration in NodeBB


This is a forum category containing topical discussion. You can start new discussions by mentioning this category.

5 Topics 20 Posts
  • Backfilling Conversations: Two Major Approaches

    activitypub fep 7888 f228 171b
    10
    5 Votes
    10 Posts
    9 Views
    projectmoon@forum.agnos.isP
    julian@community.nodebb.org said in Backfilling Conversations: Two Major Approaches: > A number of implementors follow this approach to backfill, including NodeBB, Discourse, WordPress, Frequency, Mitra, and Streams. Additional implementors like Lemmy and Piefed have expressed interest. Is this implemented currently? One weakness I have noticed in NodeBB's current federation is that posts which are in reply to a topic (e.g. a Lemmy comment) show up as individual threads until (or if) the root post of that topic shows up in the local NodeBB. It's a bit confusing of a UX, I think. Because you think: (Before root post) Why is this a post that seems to be just a random comment? (After root post) Why did that other thread disappear and why am I seeing the same comment again?
  • Re: Backfilling Conversations: Two Major Approaches

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    0 Views
    scott@loves.techS
    @julian Okay, that makes sense.
  • @mikedev @julian

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    silverpill@mitra.socialS
    @julian @mikedev Yes, if you receive an Announce(Create), and Create is not signed, then you need to retrieve this Create from its origin. When that origin server receives your signed GET request, it needs to verify that you belong to the group, but it might not have that information.
  • @mikedev @julian

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    No one has replied
  • My first Interaction: Piefed-Mastodon! Was very cool to see! :D

    4
    1
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    0 Views
    scott@loves.techS
    Hello from Hubzilla!