I know this is already on Mastodon team's radar, but I do want to stress how important this feature is.

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@KrajciTom It's always a trade-off!

@actuallybot

[doug@union.place]

@stefan
The fact they implemented a feature (QT) they originally made their USP to NOT support before resolving this is beyond disappointing.

We were promised Search and QT would solve discoverability, and still safety and accessibility are low priority (not ignored!)

[alsopaisleycat@tenforward.social]

@stefan
Fair enough.

People here are looking for different kinds of engagement.

As with the Quote function, the key is the ability to control the kind of engagement experienced.

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@doug Yeah, I agree. Quote boosts are definitely nice, but I don't know if this alone will bring more people as the team was maybe hoping.

People first need to feel safe here to come here, or stay.

[dec23k@mastodon.ie]

@stefan @USelaine
Bluesky still doesn't have post edits.

[uselaine@mastodon.online]

@dec23k @stefan
That's true! And it shows!

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@AlsoPaisleyCat Yeah, personally, I can wait for reply controls, I don't typically deal with harassment or unwanted replies. But I know many do, and then they leave, and tell their friends not to come. We're losing and missing out on diversity because of this.

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@dec23k I genuinely can't imagine not being able to edit posts. It's not great just for fixing typos, but also giving updates (important news, fundraising efforts) that might get missed.

I wonder if Bluesky has this on their roadmap.

@USelaine

[uselaine@mastodon.online]

@stefan @dec23k
Well, on that note, I've un-boosted posts that keep getting "edited" to shove it back into my notifications. I think that abuses the function.

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@USelaine Yes, it's a powerful feature and needs to be used responsibly.

@dec23k

[tchambers@indieweb.social]

@stefan +1 to this…

[informapirata@activitypub.space]

@stefan@stefanbohacek.online I'm the administrator of four Italian instances based on four different systems, and I don't see racism and mansplaining as urgent matters: the reports I received about racist posts came from junk instances I hadn't yet included in my block list, or from newly created users created for the purpose of trolling or harassing. I quickly banned the unmoderated instances or the harassing users, and the attacks on those victims have stopped.

Regarding mansplaining, I've never received any reports, although I've had to intervene on some sexist posts (and in those cases, I didn't even need to use the moderation tools; simply explaining that certain messages were offensive was enough to get the author to edit or delete them).

In short, do you really think we need more than just moderation to solve this problem, considering that in cases of targeted and repeated harassment, it's always possible to use the feature that allows you to make your posts visible only to your followers?

Finally, I find the possibility of allowing replies only to certain users:

• unbearable, because it would distort Mastodon's core feature, the idea of ​​"interaction by default."
• it would stimulate those toxic profiles who want to post without cross-examination, a phenomenon that on X/Twitter has reached unbearable heights of arrogance on the part of certain second-tier tweetstars.
• it would be harmful, because it is not an Activitypub standard and would further confuse the situation (exactly as happened with Mastodon's absurd way of handling quotes).
• furthermore, since it is not an Activitypub standard, it would be supported by none of the other social software in the Fediverse, from Friendica to Misskey, from Pleroma to Pixelfed: these software would continue to publish replies to victims of harassment, who would continue to find a wall of harassment written under their posts, visible from all other platforms and without even the possibility of reporting them (exactly as is happening in the case of post with quote)

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@informapirata Yes, of course, any reply control system would have to work across all fediverse platforms, hence this being a challenging feature to implement.

But yes, I do think people should have more control over their experience online. I think the trade-offs are worth it. Accounts that abuse this feature can be reported and suspended, I don't think that should be a problem.

If I was getting harassed on here regularly with few tools to protect myself, beyond reporting a post and waiting for someone to come to my rescue, I'd likely also leave for a platform where I will feel safer and more empowered.

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@informapirata "and I don't see racism and mansplaining as urgent matters"

Well, it's easy to miss this if you and your communities are not directly affected. One particularly insidious attack vector has been making a followers-only post and tagging your victim. This way nobody else would see the abuse outside of the attackers and the victim. The post visibility, from what I understand, also makes it harder to report such attacks.

And there is quite a bit more, I highly recommend reading this:

5 things white people can do to start making the fediverse less toxic for Black people

Anti-Blackness is a long-term problem in the fediverse. Now's a good time to start changing that.

The Nexus Of Privacy (privacy.thenexus.today)

[informapirata@activitypub.space]

@stefan@stefanbohacek.online said in I know this is already on Mastodon team's radar, but I do want to stress how important this feature is.:
> The post visibility, from what I understand, also makes it harder to report such attacks.

I can assure you that on Mastodon, if a user flags a direct message, I'm perfectly capable of seeing it, regardless of its visibility level. Unfortunately, not on Friendica. I don't know about Lemmy and NodeBB yet.

As for the rest, I'm sure I'm probably underestimating the problem of racism; my concerns are Italian-speaking, and in the Italian fediverse, racist people are immediately identified and isolated. In fact, most of the reports I've received for racism were for English-language content, and this is indicative, because English-language content makes up the minority of the reports I receive.

However, I still don't understand why limiting the ability to reply constitutes a real limitation on harassment, when there's already the option (standardized in Activitypub) to limit the visibility of posts to followers only.

Paradoxically, the inability to reply to a public post (because I think we're talking about public posts) actually increases the risk of that post being copied, linked, and screenshotted for ridicule on different, more toxic platforms outside the control of the fediverse communities (X, Thruth, 4chan, etc.).

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@informapirata

"when there's already the option (standardized in Activitypub) to limit the visibility of posts to followers only."

I don't think it's really fair that, if you're a marginalized person, you have to choose between being able to reach a wider audience, and staying safe.

As a straight white dude, I never have to worry about that. It's always safe for me to post publicly. I think everyone should enjoy that privilege. (Among many.)

[stefan@stefanbohacek.online]

@informapirata "the inability to reply to a public post actually increases the risk of that post being copied, linked, and screenshotted"

There will never be a perfect solution, it's true. But we can at least put up safeguards and empower people to protect themselves.

The bottom line is, the ability to disable replies is the top-voted issue on Mastodon's repo. Clearly people really want this.

https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc

[graue@social.coop]

@stefan 100%. I'm not sure how on their radar it is, either. I see no evidence in that issue thread of it being prioritized at all.

Also, low-hanging fruit: Blocking someone should hide their reply under your post.

So much simpler to implement, the code was literally already written back in **2022** but isn't being shipped.

Hide subthreads by blocked users when looking at a post's descendants by ClearlyClaire · Pull Request #18468 · mastodon/mastodon

This is about the server not returning known subthreads started by people blocked by the post's author, not the viewer. e.g., if we have A → B → C → D → E, where a → b means “b replies to a”, and B...

GitHub (github.com)

[dgodon@mastodon.online]

@stefan @AlsoPaisleyCat exactly! There are so many people not on here because of this who I would really love to be here. While not a silver bullet reply controls would be significant help.

[lobingera@chaos.social]

@stefan Is anyone on this thread actually working on this?

afaiu, it's a protocol change and these are hard to manage across implementations (masto + general fediverse).