Discoverability on the Fediverse and Thought Dump
-
These folks just open sourced
thanks, interesting! i wonder if they plan to federate and/or become a web scrobbler target -- that might be an interesting combo
-
Not sure how best to approach this really but I was thinking about discoverability on the Fediverse and taking notice of a lot of the streaming articles coming out of late (plus Liz Pelly's book). At the same time, I'm also seeing interesting visual platforms popping up like https://www.soot.com and https://rooms.xyz (both backed by private investors though
) and wondering about what it would take to pull people away from streaming, if knowing "it's bad" isn't enough. It sort of reminded me of things I liked about the early internet and sites with clickable Flash-based comics and online places such as BowieNet. So, without this turning into a Grandpa Simpson-style ramble, I feel like there needs to be a site that takes the best of the links below and makes a strong, fun visual space where musicians can be found randomly, either by something like location, or by creating clusters of artists or maps of listener recommendations. Mirlo have just started testing out linking musicians to labels (without it being a paid feature like Bandcamp) and I think that's a really exciting start plus the Fediwall from Indie Beat and @limebar is also really cool (in the last day there is also a live app hoping to launch called Subjam which is aiming to link to music venues and their communities) and I was curious if there's a way of building on that and even linking a few different ideas together? Here's a few examples of things that are/were slightly more offbeat ways of discovering things (aside from the aforementioned Soot and Rooms):
- Ghostly's now defunct app, where you could select from their catalogue based on "Mood" (but it was actually a colour wheel, because I downloaded it at the time).
- This genre map where you can click around then it gives examples in a playlist.
- Every Noise at Once (although I appreciate we don't necessarily want to fall under genres pushed as part of an end of year ad campaign cough cough Spotify Wrapped).
- Radio Garden - imagine this but with musicians and showing lines that indicate links between them. It's slightly infuriating that you can collaborate with your friends across your projects but on streaming, your musical projects aren't shown as being related in any way. It'd be a neat way of visualising that context and encouraging people to discover how different people are interconnected ("interdependent").
- A Number from the Ghost is one person's site but what if there was something showing fedi musicians videos in this kind of way? Or as floating images in a "constellation" (to use @Alex's terminology) that are scattered around and clickable.
Obviously some are more complex or resource-intensive than others, but it seems like there might be some weirder ideas that could help people get found in the same way you might stumble into a record shop and find something bizarre? It's hard to articulate, so I'm going to end the post here and let other people chime in.
Edited to add in Emma Warren's book, which might also have started some of this.
To me, unified search, across any audio hosting/ social music services artists or audiences choose to use, is the most obvious benefit of a federated approach. So glad to see this being enthusiastically explored here.
From an audience POV, I know I'm always drawn back to the bigger search portals (BandCamp, YouTub) because I'm most likely to find something like what I'm looking for. Diversity of hosting choices has many upsides. But searching dozens of niche sites one by one, and finding mostly tumbleweeds, isn't a sticky experience. It's not that much fun for DJs and audiences, and doesn't do much to help artists get discovered by potential future fans.
So let's say there's a federation of audio-hosting and social music services. Each with a search tool that can search across the whole network. But what happens if people search for an artist that isn't hosted within the network? Rather than tumbleweeds, what kind of results could they get that would respect consent (and thereby copyright), but still be useful?
Let's say the federated search space included a complete index of all released music, with links to all the places I can hear it, and buy it. Existing release index projects (eg MusicBrainz, Discogs), and music information projects (Wikipedia pages, AudioCulture.co.nz) could be integrated into the search space, if their custodians are wiling, or new ones could be set up for the purpose, with their index under a pro-sharing open data license.
That way, if I go to a FunkWhale or BandWagon service, or to Mirlo or whever, and search for an artist or album hosted within the federation, I could get the detailed profile curated by the artist, with the music right there to listen to. But if I search for Rage Against the Machine, instead of getting nothing, I could at least get a copy of some publicly available information about them, and links to some places I can listen to or buy their music.
Maybe with a set of 'if you like ... you might also like' links to artists hosted within the network, chosen by genre tags, newest to oldest (or vice-versa, or randomised). Or if you want to get really experimental, by an algorithm that looks at what people say they're listening to across the federation, sees that people who listen to RATM also listen to artists A, B and C, and lists them under 'you might like ...'. Or the person could toggle between these 2 serendipity modes, and maybe others.
The downside of this, for anti-corporate radicals like me, is that sometimes patrons and their money would leak out, back to the corporate platforms. But I think this is more than counterbalanced by the fact that searching on services in the federation would always be useful to audiences. So we're much more likely to keep coming back, to a place where independent music results present less friction than corporate ones.
-
Not sure how best to approach this really but I was thinking about discoverability on the Fediverse and taking notice of a lot of the streaming articles coming out of late (plus Liz Pelly's book). At the same time, I'm also seeing interesting visual platforms popping up like https://www.soot.com and https://rooms.xyz (both backed by private investors though
) and wondering about what it would take to pull people away from streaming, if knowing "it's bad" isn't enough. It sort of reminded me of things I liked about the early internet and sites with clickable Flash-based comics and online places such as BowieNet. So, without this turning into a Grandpa Simpson-style ramble, I feel like there needs to be a site that takes the best of the links below and makes a strong, fun visual space where musicians can be found randomly, either by something like location, or by creating clusters of artists or maps of listener recommendations. Mirlo have just started testing out linking musicians to labels (without it being a paid feature like Bandcamp) and I think that's a really exciting start plus the Fediwall from Indie Beat and @limebar is also really cool (in the last day there is also a live app hoping to launch called Subjam which is aiming to link to music venues and their communities) and I was curious if there's a way of building on that and even linking a few different ideas together? Here's a few examples of things that are/were slightly more offbeat ways of discovering things (aside from the aforementioned Soot and Rooms):
- Ghostly's now defunct app, where you could select from their catalogue based on "Mood" (but it was actually a colour wheel, because I downloaded it at the time).
- This genre map where you can click around then it gives examples in a playlist.
- Every Noise at Once (although I appreciate we don't necessarily want to fall under genres pushed as part of an end of year ad campaign cough cough Spotify Wrapped).
- Radio Garden - imagine this but with musicians and showing lines that indicate links between them. It's slightly infuriating that you can collaborate with your friends across your projects but on streaming, your musical projects aren't shown as being related in any way. It'd be a neat way of visualising that context and encouraging people to discover how different people are interconnected ("interdependent").
- A Number from the Ghost is one person's site but what if there was something showing fedi musicians videos in this kind of way? Or as floating images in a "constellation" (to use @Alex's terminology) that are scattered around and clickable.
Obviously some are more complex or resource-intensive than others, but it seems like there might be some weirder ideas that could help people get found in the same way you might stumble into a record shop and find something bizarre? It's hard to articulate, so I'm going to end the post here and let other people chime in.
Edited to add in Emma Warren's book, which might also have started some of this.
I’ve advocated for a sevice like https://openverse.org which already has an audio search expand to do music searches.
-
To me, unified search, across any audio hosting/ social music services artists or audiences choose to use, is the most obvious benefit of a federated approach. So glad to see this being enthusiastically explored here.
From an audience POV, I know I'm always drawn back to the bigger search portals (BandCamp, YouTub) because I'm most likely to find something like what I'm looking for. Diversity of hosting choices has many upsides. But searching dozens of niche sites one by one, and finding mostly tumbleweeds, isn't a sticky experience. It's not that much fun for DJs and audiences, and doesn't do much to help artists get discovered by potential future fans.
So let's say there's a federation of audio-hosting and social music services. Each with a search tool that can search across the whole network. But what happens if people search for an artist that isn't hosted within the network? Rather than tumbleweeds, what kind of results could they get that would respect consent (and thereby copyright), but still be useful?
Let's say the federated search space included a complete index of all released music, with links to all the places I can hear it, and buy it. Existing release index projects (eg MusicBrainz, Discogs), and music information projects (Wikipedia pages, AudioCulture.co.nz) could be integrated into the search space, if their custodians are wiling, or new ones could be set up for the purpose, with their index under a pro-sharing open data license.
That way, if I go to a FunkWhale or BandWagon service, or to Mirlo or whever, and search for an artist or album hosted within the federation, I could get the detailed profile curated by the artist, with the music right there to listen to. But if I search for Rage Against the Machine, instead of getting nothing, I could at least get a copy of some publicly available information about them, and links to some places I can listen to or buy their music.
Maybe with a set of 'if you like ... you might also like' links to artists hosted within the network, chosen by genre tags, newest to oldest (or vice-versa, or randomised). Or if you want to get really experimental, by an algorithm that looks at what people say they're listening to across the federation, sees that people who listen to RATM also listen to artists A, B and C, and lists them under 'you might like ...'. Or the person could toggle between these 2 serendipity modes, and maybe others.
The downside of this, for anti-corporate radicals like me, is that sometimes patrons and their money would leak out, back to the corporate platforms. But I think this is more than counterbalanced by the fact that searching on services in the federation would always be useful to audiences. So we're much more likely to keep coming back, to a place where independent music results present less friction than corporate ones.
Yeah, that doesn't work for most of us. I still wonder how hard it is for the current social platforms (or someone else) to offer a tweakable feed like Soundcloud or Bandcamp, based on artists, tags, other users followed. I don't know you, but these feeds are my primary source for discovering and following new artists.
1+ hour mixes a bit, too, but starting to listen to one is quite a commitment and also many don't have the list of tracks mixed, and even when they have, it's not easy to find the track I want to identify, the artist might not be in the platform and I can't follow them anyway...
Social music feeds are imho the way to go.
-
Not sure how best to approach this really but I was thinking about discoverability on the Fediverse and taking notice of a lot of the streaming articles coming out of late (plus Liz Pelly's book). At the same time, I'm also seeing interesting visual platforms popping up like https://www.soot.com and https://rooms.xyz (both backed by private investors though
) and wondering about what it would take to pull people away from streaming, if knowing "it's bad" isn't enough. It sort of reminded me of things I liked about the early internet and sites with clickable Flash-based comics and online places such as BowieNet. So, without this turning into a Grandpa Simpson-style ramble, I feel like there needs to be a site that takes the best of the links below and makes a strong, fun visual space where musicians can be found randomly, either by something like location, or by creating clusters of artists or maps of listener recommendations. Mirlo have just started testing out linking musicians to labels (without it being a paid feature like Bandcamp) and I think that's a really exciting start plus the Fediwall from Indie Beat and @limebar is also really cool (in the last day there is also a live app hoping to launch called Subjam which is aiming to link to music venues and their communities) and I was curious if there's a way of building on that and even linking a few different ideas together? Here's a few examples of things that are/were slightly more offbeat ways of discovering things (aside from the aforementioned Soot and Rooms):
- Ghostly's now defunct app, where you could select from their catalogue based on "Mood" (but it was actually a colour wheel, because I downloaded it at the time).
- This genre map where you can click around then it gives examples in a playlist.
- Every Noise at Once (although I appreciate we don't necessarily want to fall under genres pushed as part of an end of year ad campaign cough cough Spotify Wrapped).
- Radio Garden - imagine this but with musicians and showing lines that indicate links between them. It's slightly infuriating that you can collaborate with your friends across your projects but on streaming, your musical projects aren't shown as being related in any way. It'd be a neat way of visualising that context and encouraging people to discover how different people are interconnected ("interdependent").
- A Number from the Ghost is one person's site but what if there was something showing fedi musicians videos in this kind of way? Or as floating images in a "constellation" (to use @Alex's terminology) that are scattered around and clickable.
Obviously some are more complex or resource-intensive than others, but it seems like there might be some weirder ideas that could help people get found in the same way you might stumble into a record shop and find something bizarre? It's hard to articulate, so I'm going to end the post here and let other people chime in.
Edited to add in Emma Warren's book, which might also have started some of this.
I'm cautious about qualities like "sticky" and "frictionless" as they are what corporate platforms use to get us, well, stuck. The tools we make might instead be useful and complementary. We might provide a "step down" from the slick experiences corporate platforms hooked us on. Ask what would happen if we excluded a feature, or if we included it, how it might impact community and culture. For example, the expectation of seeing everything from one place. Spotify already does this. What would that future look like for federation? What behaviors might result? Would we end up with another capitalist-inspired algorithmic battleground? I don't have the answers, but in my opinion the Web as the "one place" gets us far enough. I'm betting on people to organize and collaborate in ways that limit competition (some analogy about sizes of ponds and fishes) and deepen connection.
Somewhat-relevant story time. I go to this chain of franchise media stores called The Exchange to get DVDs and video games. A couple times now I've ended up ordering something they didn't have at the location I visited. It's kinda like a library network, where you can get something from another branch sent to yours. When I've ordered something, it feels like cheating. It takes the fun out of finding an physical copy of an album or movie. I think there's a parallel here with finding something at an indie web shop versus through a portal to all the federated things. I got what I wanted, at the cost of turning it into another mindless transaction. But did I really get what I wanted? Wouldn't it be better to strike up a relationship with an independent store owner in my community instead of using a detached provider of anything I desire? Sometimes friction seems like the better option.
-
Not sure how best to approach this really but I was thinking about discoverability on the Fediverse and taking notice of a lot of the streaming articles coming out of late (plus Liz Pelly's book). At the same time, I'm also seeing interesting visual platforms popping up like https://www.soot.com and https://rooms.xyz (both backed by private investors though
) and wondering about what it would take to pull people away from streaming, if knowing "it's bad" isn't enough. It sort of reminded me of things I liked about the early internet and sites with clickable Flash-based comics and online places such as BowieNet. So, without this turning into a Grandpa Simpson-style ramble, I feel like there needs to be a site that takes the best of the links below and makes a strong, fun visual space where musicians can be found randomly, either by something like location, or by creating clusters of artists or maps of listener recommendations. Mirlo have just started testing out linking musicians to labels (without it being a paid feature like Bandcamp) and I think that's a really exciting start plus the Fediwall from Indie Beat and @limebar is also really cool (in the last day there is also a live app hoping to launch called Subjam which is aiming to link to music venues and their communities) and I was curious if there's a way of building on that and even linking a few different ideas together? Here's a few examples of things that are/were slightly more offbeat ways of discovering things (aside from the aforementioned Soot and Rooms):
- Ghostly's now defunct app, where you could select from their catalogue based on "Mood" (but it was actually a colour wheel, because I downloaded it at the time).
- This genre map where you can click around then it gives examples in a playlist.
- Every Noise at Once (although I appreciate we don't necessarily want to fall under genres pushed as part of an end of year ad campaign cough cough Spotify Wrapped).
- Radio Garden - imagine this but with musicians and showing lines that indicate links between them. It's slightly infuriating that you can collaborate with your friends across your projects but on streaming, your musical projects aren't shown as being related in any way. It'd be a neat way of visualising that context and encouraging people to discover how different people are interconnected ("interdependent").
- A Number from the Ghost is one person's site but what if there was something showing fedi musicians videos in this kind of way? Or as floating images in a "constellation" (to use @Alex's terminology) that are scattered around and clickable.
Obviously some are more complex or resource-intensive than others, but it seems like there might be some weirder ideas that could help people get found in the same way you might stumble into a record shop and find something bizarre? It's hard to articulate, so I'm going to end the post here and let other people chime in.
Edited to add in Emma Warren's book, which might also have started some of this.
We are talking about discovering... music. Very important for those who like to discover new music but... just music in the end. Maybe professional DJs, labels, and dedicated hobbyists can find the time and the patience to make discovering music their main activity. As of me, I listen to new music mostly when I'm doing routine house tasks. I listen hands free, and when I like something, I'll look who is this, like, maybe follow -- actions that will fine tune my feed.
I'm doing this on Soundcloud because the features are there, and the big community / source of music makers is there too. In the end, for 90% of artists on Soundcloud their mindset is not that different than on the Fediverse or here.
I'm looking forward to switch to a TSMN-friendly alternative, but it needs to be hands-free with likes and follows or equivalent. I won't stop house work because discovering new free/social music requires my focused attention and my hands.
-
Not sure how best to approach this really but I was thinking about discoverability on the Fediverse and taking notice of a lot of the streaming articles coming out of late (plus Liz Pelly's book). At the same time, I'm also seeing interesting visual platforms popping up like https://www.soot.com and https://rooms.xyz (both backed by private investors though
) and wondering about what it would take to pull people away from streaming, if knowing "it's bad" isn't enough. It sort of reminded me of things I liked about the early internet and sites with clickable Flash-based comics and online places such as BowieNet. So, without this turning into a Grandpa Simpson-style ramble, I feel like there needs to be a site that takes the best of the links below and makes a strong, fun visual space where musicians can be found randomly, either by something like location, or by creating clusters of artists or maps of listener recommendations. Mirlo have just started testing out linking musicians to labels (without it being a paid feature like Bandcamp) and I think that's a really exciting start plus the Fediwall from Indie Beat and @limebar is also really cool (in the last day there is also a live app hoping to launch called Subjam which is aiming to link to music venues and their communities) and I was curious if there's a way of building on that and even linking a few different ideas together? Here's a few examples of things that are/were slightly more offbeat ways of discovering things (aside from the aforementioned Soot and Rooms):
- Ghostly's now defunct app, where you could select from their catalogue based on "Mood" (but it was actually a colour wheel, because I downloaded it at the time).
- This genre map where you can click around then it gives examples in a playlist.
- Every Noise at Once (although I appreciate we don't necessarily want to fall under genres pushed as part of an end of year ad campaign cough cough Spotify Wrapped).
- Radio Garden - imagine this but with musicians and showing lines that indicate links between them. It's slightly infuriating that you can collaborate with your friends across your projects but on streaming, your musical projects aren't shown as being related in any way. It'd be a neat way of visualising that context and encouraging people to discover how different people are interconnected ("interdependent").
- A Number from the Ghost is one person's site but what if there was something showing fedi musicians videos in this kind of way? Or as floating images in a "constellation" (to use @Alex's terminology) that are scattered around and clickable.
Obviously some are more complex or resource-intensive than others, but it seems like there might be some weirder ideas that could help people get found in the same way you might stumble into a record shop and find something bizarre? It's hard to articulate, so I'm going to end the post here and let other people chime in.
Edited to add in Emma Warren's book, which might also have started some of this.
I’d say Spotify could end up being less and less the “everything” place. A lot of artists are pulling their stuff over the “Daniel Ek, AI Warmonger Scumbag Startup” thing.
-
I’d say Spotify could end up being less and less the “everything” place. A lot of artists are pulling their stuff over the “Daniel Ek, AI Warmonger Scumbag Startup” thing.
I appreciate the out-of-the-box thinking. Seem like you might appreciate my random idea for an in-person media store app.
And sure, if a musician wants to go waldenponding, and opt out of putting their music online, that's their business. If they only make their tunes available on 8-track reel-to-reel at the one surviving record shop in their town, or make a single copy on vinyl and bury it in a time capsule, that's an artistic statement in itself.
But most musicians, especially those who want to make a bit of coin out of their creative work, are interested in being discoverable. That's why record shops and music venues exist, instead of bands waiting in their garages for passers-by to stumble upon them.
Now I take your point, in that any federated search ought to be opt-out. Or even opt-in, depending on the participating service. If a musician wants to set up a FairCamp site and make it undiscoverable on our hypothetical artist-centric search federation, again, that's their business. But ...
And how do most people search that one place? Goggle, and other centralised, DataFarming general-purpose search gatekeepers. And if robots.txt is used to exclude that unfederated FairCamp site from those too, how is anyone going to find it? I mean, sure, they could put the web address on their merch, or a QR code pointing to it on their posters, but that means the only visitors to their website are people who have already discovered them.
Worth keeping in mind too that it's a lot easy to be discovered by serendipity if you live in a big city than a small town. For the same reason it's easier to meet a suitable person to ask on a date if you live in a big city.
Here's hoping
But I think what @icaria36 and I are driving at is that because of network effects, there's always tends to be an "everything place" portal for each thing people want to do online. YouTub for video. GritHub for code. BandCamp for music sales.
It seems like the only way to avoid everyone being herded into one big place, controlled by corporate DataFarmers, is to interconnect many smaller places. The most fundamental piece of glue that makes many places into one place, is federated search, that can find our work regardless of where we choose to host it, accessible from whichever app we use to look for it.
OpenVerse is great, as is search.creativecommons.org, and a number of other CC search portals, including LibreFM and open.audio for music. These could all be linked into the federated search system, selecting only those results that are marked as being under CC licenses. Other music discovery sites like Discogs and MusicBrainz, Hype Machine and Libre.fm, could both feed into and get results from the federated search if they chose, regardless of license.
The fundamental idea here is not to create a new music search portal, but to use protocol plumbing to link as many existing discoverability systems as possible together. So they work better for both artists and audiences.
-
I appreciate the out-of-the-box thinking. Seem like you might appreciate my random idea for an in-person media store app.
And sure, if a musician wants to go waldenponding, and opt out of putting their music online, that's their business. If they only make their tunes available on 8-track reel-to-reel at the one surviving record shop in their town, or make a single copy on vinyl and bury it in a time capsule, that's an artistic statement in itself.
But most musicians, especially those who want to make a bit of coin out of their creative work, are interested in being discoverable. That's why record shops and music venues exist, instead of bands waiting in their garages for passers-by to stumble upon them.
Now I take your point, in that any federated search ought to be opt-out. Or even opt-in, depending on the participating service. If a musician wants to set up a FairCamp site and make it undiscoverable on our hypothetical artist-centric search federation, again, that's their business. But ...
And how do most people search that one place? Goggle, and other centralised, DataFarming general-purpose search gatekeepers. And if robots.txt is used to exclude that unfederated FairCamp site from those too, how is anyone going to find it? I mean, sure, they could put the web address on their merch, or a QR code pointing to it on their posters, but that means the only visitors to their website are people who have already discovered them.
Worth keeping in mind too that it's a lot easy to be discovered by serendipity if you live in a big city than a small town. For the same reason it's easier to meet a suitable person to ask on a date if you live in a big city.
Here's hoping
But I think what @icaria36 and I are driving at is that because of network effects, there's always tends to be an "everything place" portal for each thing people want to do online. YouTub for video. GritHub for code. BandCamp for music sales.
It seems like the only way to avoid everyone being herded into one big place, controlled by corporate DataFarmers, is to interconnect many smaller places. The most fundamental piece of glue that makes many places into one place, is federated search, that can find our work regardless of where we choose to host it, accessible from whichever app we use to look for it.
OpenVerse is great, as is search.creativecommons.org, and a number of other CC search portals, including LibreFM and open.audio for music. These could all be linked into the federated search system, selecting only those results that are marked as being under CC licenses. Other music discovery sites like Discogs and MusicBrainz, Hype Machine and Libre.fm, could both feed into and get results from the federated search if they chose, regardless of license.
The fundamental idea here is not to create a new music search portal, but to use protocol plumbing to link as many existing discoverability systems as possible together. So they work better for both artists and audiences.
This entire website is for just music
Thanks for the perspective. Personally, I tend to listen to music actively (not as background) and discover through journalism and community such as Hearing Things. And I'm content to write on a piece of paper whether I want to dig deeper or buy a physical copy. A recommendation feed is of no interest to me.
I suggest that we do this by our own volition rather than with protocol plumbing. I'm skeptical that programmatically linking discoverability systems is better than getting to know one another and establishing relationships. The challenge then is initial exposure. I find gossip (e.g. friends of friends) to be a more organic starting point in our designs. Even technology like radio broadcast is best-case curated by humans, despite the limited relationship between curator and listener.
@strypey I'll check out your random idea. I appreciated the IMC essay you linked in your introduction post, and enjoyed reading some of your reflections on Indymedia. I'm guilty of some soft waldenponding, but my hope is that anyone might help bend the arc of our relationship with computers rather than accept its trajectory as inevitable.
All this said, an ActivityPub-based aggregator does feel inevitable at this point. I'm not convinced it's as good for music and musicians as it seems.
-
This entire website is for just music
Thanks for the perspective. Personally, I tend to listen to music actively (not as background) and discover through journalism and community such as Hearing Things. And I'm content to write on a piece of paper whether I want to dig deeper or buy a physical copy. A recommendation feed is of no interest to me.
I suggest that we do this by our own volition rather than with protocol plumbing. I'm skeptical that programmatically linking discoverability systems is better than getting to know one another and establishing relationships. The challenge then is initial exposure. I find gossip (e.g. friends of friends) to be a more organic starting point in our designs. Even technology like radio broadcast is best-case curated by humans, despite the limited relationship between curator and listener.
@strypey I'll check out your random idea. I appreciated the IMC essay you linked in your introduction post, and enjoyed reading some of your reflections on Indymedia. I'm guilty of some soft waldenponding, but my hope is that anyone might help bend the arc of our relationship with computers rather than accept its trajectory as inevitable.
All this said, an ActivityPub-based aggregator does feel inevitable at this point. I'm not convinced it's as good for music and musicians as it seems.
We started with a world of record shops and many small websites. If that was adequate to the purpose, the DataFarming platforms would never have taken hold in the first place. It's now cliché to point out that those who do not learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it. But I've seen it happen.
All that said, it doesn't have to be an either/or.
I think you're right about the first part, because it already exists in the form of FunkWhale and BandWagon. In fact the whole fediverse and AP happened to some degree because Matt and co wanted to federate GNU FM (and Christine and co wanted to federate GNU MediaGoblin). There's clearly a demand for this, and has been some time.
But I'm open to other suggestions, and I'd love to see other experiments being run in parallel. What could this community add to awareness days like NetLabel day, or events along the lines of the FediVision Song Contest and CC Music Awards? Or Record Store Day, which my random idea about geogating releases could tie in with for example.
These are conversations that probably need their own topic, but they're definitely worth having.
-
This entire website is for just music
Thanks for the perspective. Personally, I tend to listen to music actively (not as background) and discover through journalism and community such as Hearing Things. And I'm content to write on a piece of paper whether I want to dig deeper or buy a physical copy. A recommendation feed is of no interest to me.
I suggest that we do this by our own volition rather than with protocol plumbing. I'm skeptical that programmatically linking discoverability systems is better than getting to know one another and establishing relationships. The challenge then is initial exposure. I find gossip (e.g. friends of friends) to be a more organic starting point in our designs. Even technology like radio broadcast is best-case curated by humans, despite the limited relationship between curator and listener.
@strypey I'll check out your random idea. I appreciated the IMC essay you linked in your introduction post, and enjoyed reading some of your reflections on Indymedia. I'm guilty of some soft waldenponding, but my hope is that anyone might help bend the arc of our relationship with computers rather than accept its trajectory as inevitable.
All this said, an ActivityPub-based aggregator does feel inevitable at this point. I'm not convinced it's as good for music and musicians as it seems.
Oh and ...
The publications you regularly read are a recommendation feed. I think what you're really criticising here is the nudging machine that all the big platforms have enshittified into. I don't think anyone is advocating decentralised search plumbing that works like that.
Maybe let's turn the discussion in a more fun direction by getting into the weeds of what kind of federated search we do have in mind. I've laid out my ideas and talked a fair bit here, so I'm going to shut up for a while and see what the discussion so far brings up for others : )
-
Not sure how best to approach this really but I was thinking about discoverability on the Fediverse and taking notice of a lot of the streaming articles coming out of late (plus Liz Pelly's book). At the same time, I'm also seeing interesting visual platforms popping up like https://www.soot.com and https://rooms.xyz (both backed by private investors though
) and wondering about what it would take to pull people away from streaming, if knowing "it's bad" isn't enough. It sort of reminded me of things I liked about the early internet and sites with clickable Flash-based comics and online places such as BowieNet. So, without this turning into a Grandpa Simpson-style ramble, I feel like there needs to be a site that takes the best of the links below and makes a strong, fun visual space where musicians can be found randomly, either by something like location, or by creating clusters of artists or maps of listener recommendations. Mirlo have just started testing out linking musicians to labels (without it being a paid feature like Bandcamp) and I think that's a really exciting start plus the Fediwall from Indie Beat and @limebar is also really cool (in the last day there is also a live app hoping to launch called Subjam which is aiming to link to music venues and their communities) and I was curious if there's a way of building on that and even linking a few different ideas together? Here's a few examples of things that are/were slightly more offbeat ways of discovering things (aside from the aforementioned Soot and Rooms):
- Ghostly's now defunct app, where you could select from their catalogue based on "Mood" (but it was actually a colour wheel, because I downloaded it at the time).
- This genre map where you can click around then it gives examples in a playlist.
- Every Noise at Once (although I appreciate we don't necessarily want to fall under genres pushed as part of an end of year ad campaign cough cough Spotify Wrapped).
- Radio Garden - imagine this but with musicians and showing lines that indicate links between them. It's slightly infuriating that you can collaborate with your friends across your projects but on streaming, your musical projects aren't shown as being related in any way. It'd be a neat way of visualising that context and encouraging people to discover how different people are interconnected ("interdependent").
- A Number from the Ghost is one person's site but what if there was something showing fedi musicians videos in this kind of way? Or as floating images in a "constellation" (to use @Alex's terminology) that are scattered around and clickable.
Obviously some are more complex or resource-intensive than others, but it seems like there might be some weirder ideas that could help people get found in the same way you might stumble into a record shop and find something bizarre? It's hard to articulate, so I'm going to end the post here and let other people chime in.
Edited to add in Emma Warren's book, which might also have started some of this.
I contend the success of DataFarming platforms is due to the stickiness and frictionlessness of their commercial design, not because they are better for music and musicians. We knowingly and unknowingly choose stuff that's bad for us in daily life. Like when I want a cookie. I eat the cookie and it tastes good, even though I know it's bad for me. If I eat a dozen cookies everyday, I acknowledge that my health may be negatively impacted. In terms of culture and community, choices are more complex and their potential effects are harder to foresee.
Feed or not, what I'm trying to do is shed light on the choices in front of us and get us thinking about why we might or might not want them. And you're right, it doesn't have to be either/or.
Great idea. As a federation noob, I have some questions. Is there a separate website for searching or could you search across servers from any place that supports federation? Do servers manually declare which servers they can search? I don't use Mastodon, curious how it works there.
-
I contend the success of DataFarming platforms is due to the stickiness and frictionlessness of their commercial design, not because they are better for music and musicians. We knowingly and unknowingly choose stuff that's bad for us in daily life. Like when I want a cookie. I eat the cookie and it tastes good, even though I know it's bad for me. If I eat a dozen cookies everyday, I acknowledge that my health may be negatively impacted. In terms of culture and community, choices are more complex and their potential effects are harder to foresee.
Feed or not, what I'm trying to do is shed light on the choices in front of us and get us thinking about why we might or might not want them. And you're right, it doesn't have to be either/or.
Great idea. As a federation noob, I have some questions. Is there a separate website for searching or could you search across servers from any place that supports federation? Do servers manually declare which servers they can search? I don't use Mastodon, curious how it works there.
Yeah, this is my thought on it. I love the app idea, but get annoyed with being connected to the online world too much - and where I live doesn't exactly have loads of record shops and venues to opt into something like this (the ones that do exist are slightly spread out). Made me wonder if there's a meeting point between both - as in, if I don't pick up my phone for an hour, it unlocks a track, or if I walk 100 steps, does it show something cool? It could even be something as simple as sharing something unlocks part of a larger musical puzzle and builds community that way. Maybe there's a meeting point between the intentionality and conscious listening and blended online/offline discovery?
And with the federated concern, I think we're all burnt out from what we've been offered previously and whilst it's right to be skeptical of it solving every musician's problems, it's probably the most exciting option to me right now because it's giving a bit more autonomy in terms of being able to take my profile with me somewhere else in the Fediverse if needs change and it's a welcome tonal shift from being an algo and ads slot machine (like Facebook, where I could pay to access my own audience and still not feel that I have any real transparency in the results). I agree that it needs careful consideration though to not turn into more of the same and be privacy respecting if using location-based info (as Loki rightly pointed out in a conversation about it via Mirlo).
Anyway, these are all really interesting ideas from all corners! Also sent the dev of freq.social an invite but they're taking a well-earned break over the summer - fingers crossed they'll join in at some point and add to this. It'd be interesting to get Glenn McDonald involved too (mentioned this before here), but not sure how yet.
-
We are talking about discovering... music. Very important for those who like to discover new music but... just music in the end. Maybe professional DJs, labels, and dedicated hobbyists can find the time and the patience to make discovering music their main activity. As of me, I listen to new music mostly when I'm doing routine house tasks. I listen hands free, and when I like something, I'll look who is this, like, maybe follow -- actions that will fine tune my feed.
I'm doing this on Soundcloud because the features are there, and the big community / source of music makers is there too. In the end, for 90% of artists on Soundcloud their mindset is not that different than on the Fediverse or here.
I'm looking forward to switch to a TSMN-friendly alternative, but it needs to be hands-free with likes and follows or equivalent. I won't stop house work because discovering new free/social music requires my focused attention and my hands.
Really important point!!!! Of course as @timglorioso says there are other perspectives as well, and those are important too, but very often in fora like this there's a self-selecting sample of people who are (a) really interested in music and (b) have time to invest (otherwise we wouldn't be posting here!) so as a result there are a lot fewer "casual users" than in the rest of the world.
And great thread in general, including the tension between "frictionless" as on the one hand something that people want but also what corporate platforms use to get people stuck.
-
I’d say Spotify could end up being less and less the “everything” place. A lot of artists are pulling their stuff over the “Daniel Ek, AI Warmonger Scumbag Startup” thing.
Or pulling their work because of all the other, especially AI, things that Spotify is doing to devalue creators and creative content. I know I’m looking to pull my catalog from Spotify and have already stopped using Spotify as a platform.