you cloudbrained jokers have managed to convince everyone that object storage is some special thing when in reality it is just "normal http" and it "doesn't have folders" except "it totally does for every practical purpose except for the tooling doesn'...
-
you cloudbrained jokers have managed to convince everyone that object storage is some special thing when in reality it is just "normal http" and it "doesn't have folders" except "it totally does for every practical purpose except for the tooling doesn't let you use them like folders" and whatever makes it special on the backend doesn't matter to anyone except the people who administer object storage systems
-
you cloudbrained jokers have managed to convince everyone that object storage is some special thing when in reality it is just "normal http" and it "doesn't have folders" except "it totally does for every practical purpose except for the tooling doesn't let you use them like folders" and whatever makes it special on the backend doesn't matter to anyone except the people who administer object storage systems
"prefix?" we had a word for that, it's just "path"
-
"prefix?" we had a word for that, it's just "path"
"s3://"? we also already had a scheme for that, it's called "https://"
-
you cloudbrained jokers have managed to convince everyone that object storage is some special thing when in reality it is just "normal http" and it "doesn't have folders" except "it totally does for every practical purpose except for the tooling doesn't let you use them like folders" and whatever makes it special on the backend doesn't matter to anyone except the people who administer object storage systems
@jonny It's so much harder to implement than webdav and that's what makes it truly special.
-
you cloudbrained jokers have managed to convince everyone that object storage is some special thing when in reality it is just "normal http" and it "doesn't have folders" except "it totally does for every practical purpose except for the tooling doesn't let you use them like folders" and whatever makes it special on the backend doesn't matter to anyone except the people who administer object storage systems
@jonny "the filesystem doesn't scale", says people who have never touched a filesystem in their entire life
-
@jonny "the filesystem doesn't scale", says people who have never touched a filesystem in their entire life
@atax1a
> "the filesystem doesn't scale"
> *everyone just using it like a filesystem* -
"s3://"? we also already had a scheme for that, it's called "https://"
"add a dependency for some s3-specific tool"
no i don't think i will
-
you cloudbrained jokers have managed to convince everyone that object storage is some special thing when in reality it is just "normal http" and it "doesn't have folders" except "it totally does for every practical purpose except for the tooling doesn't let you use them like folders" and whatever makes it special on the backend doesn't matter to anyone except the people who administer object storage systems
jonny@neuromatch.social it is the technical encapsulation of "fire and forget" style file management.
Toss it into a global folder and forget it exists.
