Jack Dorsey skipped ActivityPub, built AtProto, lost Twitter, funded Bluesky, watched it become a company with VCs and a board, said it was "repeating all the mistakes," left, and now funds Nostr.
-
@thisismissem @evan @quillmatiq more adoption, like Metas Threads? There are dozens of projects on the fediverse, more than atproto, so thatโs not really coming across as you think it is lol
@dansup @thisismissem @evan @quillmatiq And virtually all of them literally cannot function without Bluesky.
-
@evan @dansup I'm not gaslighting anyone, Evan, and I would hope that you would know me better than that after our conversations.
You can throw stones back at the Fedi's bet around Meta and all the other companies that promised ActivityPub integration but never delivered. What are we even doing here?
@quillmatiq @dansup I know you and I appreciate your work.
Coalitions exist when different factions and players share some common goals. But they don't have to share *all* the same goals to work together.
I think there's a good case to be made that the ATProto community and the Fediverse can be a coalition to work together on the Open Social Web.
That doesn't mean we can't talk about our differences, or advocate for our own protocols and technologies.
-
@dansup So ActivityPub needed VC money, too?
Btw, Fediverse Threads is in maintenance mode and is one-way, basically RSS with likes, so are we going to even consider it a part of the ecosystem at this point?
@dansup Also, I'm sorry, I have to ask - but how many independent services do you think atproto has right now? Because it's not just a handful, as you're making it out to be.
-
@evan @dansup @quillmatiq Evan, perhaps spend some time introspecting why ActivityPub didn't get more adoption and why developers love AT Protocol.
@thisismissem @evan @dansup @quillmatiq
Why do you think this is Emelia?
-
@dansup So ActivityPub needed VC money, too?
Btw, Fediverse Threads is in maintenance mode and is one-way, basically RSS with likes, so are we going to even consider it a part of the ecosystem at this point?
@quillmatiq @dansup @thisismissem Friend, what's your goal here?
-
@dansup Also, I'm sorry, I have to ask - but how many independent services do you think atproto has right now? Because it's not just a handful, as you're making it out to be.
@quillmatiq @dansup @thisismissem @evan
How many Anuj?
And, what constitutes an AT Proto "independent service"?
-
@dansup Also, I'm sorry, I have to ask - but how many independent services do you think atproto has right now? Because it's not just a handful, as you're making it out to be.
@quillmatiq @dansup @thisismissem @evan I don't know every atproto service out there, but I know Leaflet, Blacksky, and I think there's something being worked on called EuroSky? I know there's more, I remember researching this at one point but that was a while ago so I forgot a lot of the other ones but yeah, all this talk of atproto shouldn't have had a chance honestly doesn't help, we should be making the entire ecosystem better by trying to make the experience the best it can be across both ActivityPub and atproto.
-
@evan @dansup There are brilliant developers who were building in between the two spaces who decided it wasn't worth the hate they were receiving. If you want, I can share how much hate I get for bridging, and the mass majority comes from this side of the ecosystem, I just continue on because I believe in the mission.
It's a culture problem, and you two have the power to help change that.
@quillmatiq @dansup I really appreciate the work that you and A New Social do to keep the social web stitched together.
-
-
@dansup @thisismissem @evan @quillmatiq And virtually all of them literally cannot function without Bluesky.
@reflex @dansup @thisismissem @evan @quillmatiq
Seems like there are some AT Proto experts here. Perhaps someone can address the issue of the inherent limitations of the protocol due to quadratic scaling? Or, credibly refute this assertion.
Mastodon Migration (@mastodonmigration@mastodon.online)
@FediThing@chinwag.org One thing AT Proto advocates studiously ignore are discussions about whether AT Proto is actually capable of being truly decentralized. @cwebber@social.coop has raised the issue of quadratic scaling of the network as it goes wide (more instances). If this is true, and no one has refuted it, then it will be effectively impossible for the network to accommodate more large instances. https://dustycloud.org/blog/re-re-bluesky-decentralization/ (see section on quadratic scaling) #ATProrocol #Bluesky #QuadraticScaling
Mastodon (mastodon.online)
-
@quillmatiq @dansup I know you and I appreciate your work.
Coalitions exist when different factions and players share some common goals. But they don't have to share *all* the same goals to work together.
I think there's a good case to be made that the ATProto community and the Fediverse can be a coalition to work together on the Open Social Web.
That doesn't mean we can't talk about our differences, or advocate for our own protocols and technologies.
@quillmatiq @dansup And, absolutely, I'm really concerned about how we get more of those companies re-engaged.
It wasn't the only factor, but having multiple protocols in the space makes it more likely that implementers take a wait-and-see approach and don't use either.
-
@evan @dansup @quillmatiq Evan, perhaps spend some time introspecting why ActivityPub didn't get more adoption and why developers love AT Protocol.
@thisismissem @dansup @quillmatiq This is my number one area of interest!
-
@evan @dansup What's hurt it more is not working together on a unified strategy and putting up walls every time there's a chance to do so.
There are folks on the atproto side who have shown an intent to bridge with services like Pixelfed and Loops, *including* adding the logo on the posts to help promote services. We can either move together, or we can continue to push each other away and fall to trillion-dollar companies building their own ecosystems, some of whom the Fedi bet the farm on.
@quillmatiq I like your vision of peace and collaboration. But when there is a working protocol and a team builds a completely new one that is not compatible with the existing. Who is building a wall? When I want to build a new "open social web" service or client, how many protocols should I need to implement? This is not about if mastodon or pixelfed could be Atproto compatible, it's not about services it's about the protocol. @evan @dansup
-
@evan @dansup The number of developers and communities who've been pushed out of the Fedi because of this elitist mentality should be alarming to any builder in this space. Are we ever going to learn to do better, or are we going to continue pushing more people away?
The vibes aren't good, Evan, and I really hope you're aware of that, because vibes make or break a community.
@quillmatiq @dansup I don't have a lot of examples of this, honestly.
I can think of a few great ActivityPub implementers who dual-stack, like micro.blog and Friendica, but I don't know of ones that stopped supporting ActivityPub because someone said Bluesky was started by a billionaire.
I think it's *great* when servers and clients support AP, regardless of what other protocols or services they support.
-
@quillmatiq @dansup @thisismissem Friend, what's your goal here?
@evan What is the goal of calling out the history of atproto when the majority of the current community, including Bluesky, wants to collaborate? I'm trying to show that throwing stones is unproductive because there are stones lying everywhere.
-
@quillmatiq @dansup I don't have a lot of examples of this, honestly.
I can think of a few great ActivityPub implementers who dual-stack, like micro.blog and Friendica, but I don't know of ones that stopped supporting ActivityPub because someone said Bluesky was started by a billionaire.
I think it's *great* when servers and clients support AP, regardless of what other protocols or services they support.
@quillmatiq @dansup I do know how toxic the response was to Bridgy Fed when Ryan first announced the Bluesky bridge, and I think his ability to weather that storm will go down as one of the most heroic efforts in the history of the social web.
-
@quillmatiq @dansup I do know how toxic the response was to Bridgy Fed when Ryan first announced the Bluesky bridge, and I think his ability to weather that storm will go down as one of the most heroic efforts in the history of the social web.
@evan @dansup The storm has not died down, Evan. The hate doesn't just flow to Ryan, it also flows to anyone involved in that work or promotes it. There is a cultural problem that large voices in the ActivityPub space need to reckon with, and I think that work should've started months ago, if not years ago.
-
@evan @dansup The storm has not died down, Evan. The hate doesn't just flow to Ryan, it also flows to anyone involved in that work or promotes it. There is a cultural problem that large voices in the ActivityPub space need to reckon with, and I think that work should've started months ago, if not years ago.
-
@quillmatiq @dansup I don't have a lot of examples of this, honestly.
I can think of a few great ActivityPub implementers who dual-stack, like micro.blog and Friendica, but I don't know of ones that stopped supporting ActivityPub because someone said Bluesky was started by a billionaire.
I think it's *great* when servers and clients support AP, regardless of what other protocols or services they support.
@evan It's not about the comments around billionaires, I'm talking about a culture that pushes communities out, even ones that want to collaborate - both technical and non-technical. I really hope you're aware of the numerous instances of this, it's really important if you want to make this space welcoming.
-
@thisismissem @dansup @quillmatiq This is my number one area of interest!
@evan @dansup @quillmatiq interest is great and all, but understanding the social and power dynamics at play is more important.
Every time some leader of an ActivityPub project goes on a tirade against another protocol or project, all it does is hurt the entire ecosystem. It prevents productive partnerships, it creates friction and fights.
We've seen this countless times, and meanwhile majority of ActivityPub applications are not striving for ActivityPub interoperability, but for Mastodon interoperability.
There is so much power centralization in ActivityPub it's not funny, let's not forget that the protocol was left to rot by the W3C for the longest time, when it could've continued on-wards. The amount of infighting and politics here drives people away.
I've talked with folks who have really great ideas, and I've been like "come bring this to a standards meeting, this is really cool" and the response time and again is "I don't want to be involved with those people", because they've seen countless negative interactions.
Meanwhile, in AT Protocol, it's extremely common place to get different application developers and organisations to come together to standardise things, the best example is https://standard.site โ I'm also helping a few developers work on interoperability for other things within the Atmosphere, because they realise that they're stronger together.
In ActivityPub there's been constant division "this software is better than that software", and petty little fights about "this isn't really activitypub because it doesn't do what mastodon does, so it doesn't interoperate fully" โ Dan was the target of one such hit piece.
The office hours that the bluesky team run every two weeks? They basically entirely focus on sharing and promoting the cool work by other people in the ecosystem, here's some notes from the latest: https://bsky.app/profile/thisismissem.social/post/3mere5l7knk2n
I've mentioned it before, but I've stopped actively contributing to Mastodon because the lack of respect that they show other contributors is so dire that it's not financially viable for me to contribute.
