Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
We Distribute
  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Has anyone ever considered a federated or open-source alternative to Open Graph or Schema..org?

Has anyone ever considered a federated or open-source alternative to Open Graph or Schema..org?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
2 Posts 2 Posters 205 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • teknevra@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
    teknevra@lemmy.worldT This user is from outside of this forum
    teknevra@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by teknevra@lemmy.world
    #1

    I've been thinking lately about how much of the web's metadata—like link previews, rich snippets, and structured content—relies on centralized standards like:


    Open Graph (by Meta)

    https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graph_Protocol

    https://www.opengraph.xyz/

    https://ogp.me/

    https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/what-is-open-graph-and-how-can-i-use-it-for-my-website/


    and


    Schema.org (by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, and Yandex)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org


    These formats are widely used for things like link previews in social media, product listings in search engines, event markup, and more.

    Open Graph lets websites control how their content appears when shared (e.g., title, description, preview image), and Schema.org provides a broader vocabulary for marking up structured data like reviews, articles, events, etc.

    But both are effectively governed by large, centralized entities.


    This makes me wonder:

    Has anyone ever proposed, or worked on, a federated or community-governed alternative to these standards?

    Something open-source and consensus-driven that better fits the ethos of the Fediverse?


    I imagine such a system could:

    Empower smaller platforms and content creators.

    Improve interoperability across decentralized platforms.

    Prevent a few big players from shaping metadata standards to suit themselves.


    I’d love to attempt something like this, but I currently lack the time, energy, and technical skill.

    Still, I wanted to throw the idea out there in case it sparks interest, or someone knows of prior attempts.

    Would love to hear your thoughts, links or brainstorms.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • teknevra@lemmy.worldT teknevra@lemmy.world

      I've been thinking lately about how much of the web's metadata—like link previews, rich snippets, and structured content—relies on centralized standards like:


      Open Graph (by Meta)

      https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Graph_Protocol

      https://www.opengraph.xyz/

      https://ogp.me/

      https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/what-is-open-graph-and-how-can-i-use-it-for-my-website/


      and


      Schema.org (by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, and Yandex)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org


      These formats are widely used for things like link previews in social media, product listings in search engines, event markup, and more.

      Open Graph lets websites control how their content appears when shared (e.g., title, description, preview image), and Schema.org provides a broader vocabulary for marking up structured data like reviews, articles, events, etc.

      But both are effectively governed by large, centralized entities.


      This makes me wonder:

      Has anyone ever proposed, or worked on, a federated or community-governed alternative to these standards?

      Something open-source and consensus-driven that better fits the ethos of the Fediverse?


      I imagine such a system could:

      Empower smaller platforms and content creators.

      Improve interoperability across decentralized platforms.

      Prevent a few big players from shaping metadata standards to suit themselves.


      I’d love to attempt something like this, but I currently lack the time, energy, and technical skill.

      Still, I wanted to throw the idea out there in case it sparks interest, or someone knows of prior attempts.

      Would love to hear your thoughts, links or brainstorms.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      catloaf@lemm.ee
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      What exactly would a federated alternative to this look like for you? It's a block of metadata.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1

      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

      Register Login
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups