Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
We Distribute
  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. SocialHub has been the most prominent place for cross-project collaboration for years.

SocialHub has been the most prominent place for cross-project collaboration for years.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • silverpill@mitra.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    silverpill@mitra.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    silverpill@mitra.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    SocialHub has been the most prominent place for cross-project collaboration for years. This is where the FEP process was born, after all. I suspect that the need to create an account there was a major barrier to entry, but this is no longer the case as the forum supports ActivityPub.

    Cross-project forums like SocialHub can then have a dedicated category for each software they know about

    There is such category already: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/c/software/14

    It appears to be not federated, though.

    -----

    Aside:

    For the size of the group [working on federating long form articles], which as you say is not large

    I wonder what they meant by this. There are lots of projects that support long form content.

    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • silverpill@mitra.socialS silverpill@mitra.social

      SocialHub has been the most prominent place for cross-project collaboration for years. This is where the FEP process was born, after all. I suspect that the need to create an account there was a major barrier to entry, but this is no longer the case as the forum supports ActivityPub.

      Cross-project forums like SocialHub can then have a dedicated category for each software they know about

      There is such category already: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/c/software/14

      It appears to be not federated, though.

      -----

      Aside:

      For the size of the group [working on federating long form articles], which as you say is not large

      I wonder what they meant by this. There are lots of projects that support long form content.

      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
      julian@community.nodebb.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
      julian@community.nodebb.org
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      silverpill@mitra.social said in Against fragmentation: unifying dev discussions with forum federation:
      > I wonder what they meant by this. There are lots of projects that support long form content.

      I think what johnonolan@mastodon.xyz was trying to say was that given the relative size of the ActivityPub developer community, it's a little (or a lot) surprising that our developer discussions are as fractured as they are.

      That's probably why I push so hard for discussions about fedi to take place on fedi.

      I do get the appeal of smaller back channels, but they shouldn't be where the main business is conducted if possible...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups