Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
We Distribute
  1. Home
  2. Technical Discussion
  3. I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky.

I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technical Discussion
171 Posts 49 Posters 4.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ikuturso@mastodon.socialI ikuturso@mastodon.social

    @esoteric_programmer @alter_kaker @mcc as I understand it the cost of a relay has gone down because you can run it without keeping full account of the message history for all time and instead restrict what you have to a time-window.

    Raises the question of whether that's good enough if we want real alternatives to the official company infra though.

    trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    trwnh@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #79

    @ikuturso @esoteric_programmer @alter_kaker @mcc that $34/month is enough for 2 hours per the article

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

      @mcc what exactly is the benefit of migrating to a non bluesky PDS? I understand being on an entirely different vertical stack like Blacksky or Northsky but what does being on a PDS give you? Aren't you still (almost) entirely at bluesky's mercy?

      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mcc@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #80

      @eniko the advantage is the data is yours and you can recover it later if Bluesky goes berserk. This is a mild advantage but in keeping with the mild advantages operating a PDS is also a mild imposition. It's practically a git repo with a weird frontend. I'm not saying self host but if people are starting to host alternate bluesky bits, this is the most likely thing for someone to alternate host (because it is the least demanding thing) so it's the most likely option to appear.

      mcc@mastodon.socialM mat@friendica.exon.nameM 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • mat@friendica.exon.nameM mat@friendica.exon.name
        @lrhodes @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer This moves into a lot of stuff about distributed identity that I don't get. But certainly the Fediverse has the same problem. Ultimately the credible exit is waving goodbye to your history, somehow letting your followers know you've got a new handle, and hoping they update their contacts. That sounds hard, but it's still a fairly credible exit, since your followers don't have to move too.
        trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        trwnh@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #81

        @mat @lrhodes @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer the pds/storage can change because the identity is a separate layer. the authority is a DID (most likely did:plc but did:web is also supported). the DID document points to your current PDS. this allows the pds to change as long as the did stays the same.

        example: you are did:plc:whatever, and your pds is shiitake.example, but you migrate your data from shiitake to puffball. the did document updates the service pointer: https://web.plc.directory/did/did:plc:ewvi7nxzyoun6zhxrhs64oiz

        lrhodes@merveilles.townL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

          I (me, mcc) never trusted Bluesky, so I've been self-hosting my own PDS from the start. I've been happily using blacksky.community for the last month (since Bluesky started gating access to their appview/web frontend on clicking to agree to a new TOS that seemed to me sketchy). Hypothetically, "Gertrude" could do the same. She can join Northsky PDS, make posts through Zeppelin, and Bluesky blocks her but Blacksky just fetches the posts from her PDS for me, and I get to read them.

          Right? (2/3)

          tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
          tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
          tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.place
          wrote last edited by
          #82

          @mcc how hard is it to set up your own PDS?

          mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

            @eniko the advantage is the data is yours and you can recover it later if Bluesky goes berserk. This is a mild advantage but in keeping with the mild advantages operating a PDS is also a mild imposition. It's practically a git repo with a weird frontend. I'm not saying self host but if people are starting to host alternate bluesky bits, this is the most likely thing for someone to alternate host (because it is the least demanding thing) so it's the most likely option to appear.

            mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mcc@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #83

            @eniko In a world where Mastodon/ActivityPub doesn't exist, having the PDS would be a cool opportunity because if you ever do bug out from bluesky, instead of having to find someone replicating that giant teetering ATProto stack you could bridge to, or create, some kind of alternative system. But in this actual world this feels pointless since the alternative systems (like ActivityPub) that exist already are more capable to begin with, so why not just make the posts there to begin with.

            mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.placeT tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.place

              @mcc how hard is it to set up your own PDS?

              mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
              mcc@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #84

              @tylercook like, absurdly easy. Do you know Docker or any Docker-like system?

              tylercook@mastodon.gamedev.placeT 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ikuturso@mastodon.socialI ikuturso@mastodon.social

                @jrose @mcc Even the portability being better is somewhat theoretical right now because if your identity is using did:plc then you are unable to move away from did:plc and Bluesky PBC has custody of your keys... And also like people have noticed hosting your own data in a PDS does not really make you independent from their actions so the point of doing it is somewhat unclear.

                trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                trwnh@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #85

                @ikuturso @jrose @mcc yeah, unfortunately bluesky has zero interest in supporting did migrations. they only support changing your dns handle

                EDIT: source https://bsky.app/profile/bnewbold.net/post/3lchpwc2hws2r

                mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                  @eniko In a world where Mastodon/ActivityPub doesn't exist, having the PDS would be a cool opportunity because if you ever do bug out from bluesky, instead of having to find someone replicating that giant teetering ATProto stack you could bridge to, or create, some kind of alternative system. But in this actual world this feels pointless since the alternative systems (like ActivityPub) that exist already are more capable to begin with, so why not just make the posts there to begin with.

                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcc@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #86

                  @eniko I think M Kasprzak actually has a fork of the official Bluesky PDS, right now, that also publishes to ActivityPub. I think Wafrn can do that too. So that would be an example of "bridging" like I mean— you could start syndicating your bluesky posts to Fediverse, and if you ever bug out from Bluesky just disconnect those endpoints and now you've just got a fediverse server. But this scenario assumes you weren't already more established and comfortable on Fediverse than Bluesky to start with

                  eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

                    @mat @lrhodes @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer the pds/storage can change because the identity is a separate layer. the authority is a DID (most likely did:plc but did:web is also supported). the DID document points to your current PDS. this allows the pds to change as long as the did stays the same.

                    example: you are did:plc:whatever, and your pds is shiitake.example, but you migrate your data from shiitake to puffball. the did document updates the service pointer: https://web.plc.directory/did/did:plc:ewvi7nxzyoun6zhxrhs64oiz

                    lrhodes@merveilles.townL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lrhodes@merveilles.townL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lrhodes@merveilles.town
                    wrote last edited by
                    #87

                    @trwnh @mat @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer Yeah, my understanding a while back was that the canonical location is defined by reference to the DID address. The way, you can still have a canonical address even if the originating account shifts to a new address. That prevents the old PDS from retaining authority. But so much has changed since I firmed that understanding that I wasn't sure whether or not it had changed. (One would hope the procedures for determining canonicity wouldn't change.)

                    trwnh@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

                      @ikuturso @jrose @mcc yeah, unfortunately bluesky has zero interest in supporting did migrations. they only support changing your dns handle

                      EDIT: source https://bsky.app/profile/bnewbold.net/post/3lchpwc2hws2r

                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mcc@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #88

                      @trwnh @ikuturso @jrose if someone develops a better did method, surely you could just have two DIDs point to the same repo? Maybe they could even have the same "key" (the Z in did:Y:Z)

                      erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                        @eniko I think M Kasprzak actually has a fork of the official Bluesky PDS, right now, that also publishes to ActivityPub. I think Wafrn can do that too. So that would be an example of "bridging" like I mean— you could start syndicating your bluesky posts to Fediverse, and if you ever bug out from Bluesky just disconnect those endpoints and now you've just got a fediverse server. But this scenario assumes you weren't already more established and comfortable on Fediverse than Bluesky to start with

                        eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE This user is from outside of this forum
                        eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place
                        wrote last edited by
                        #89

                        @mcc yeah I've been asked repeatedly to join wafrn but I've never wanted to because I don't want to post the exact same things on bluesky that I do here. They're two different cultures that react very differently to posts. And also, now, it's been made clear to me it's not necessarily safe to post as freely on bluesky

                        mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

                          @mcc yeah I've been asked repeatedly to join wafrn but I've never wanted to because I don't want to post the exact same things on bluesky that I do here. They're two different cultures that react very differently to posts. And also, now, it's been made clear to me it's not necessarily safe to post as freely on bluesky

                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #90

                          @eniko Yes, I think these are great points.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                            @trwnh @ikuturso @jrose if someone develops a better did method, surely you could just have two DIDs point to the same repo? Maybe they could even have the same "key" (the Z in did:Y:Z)

                            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE This user is from outside of this forum
                            erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net
                            wrote last edited by
                            #91

                            @mcc @trwnh @ikuturso @jrose But the problem is that did:plc by definition always points to Bluesky’s DID repo.

                            trwnh@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ikuturso@mastodon.socialI ikuturso@mastodon.social

                              @nullpotential @mcc people on Bluesky who have soured on fedi often complain about having been lectured about using alt text and CWs for what it's worth.

                              trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                              trwnh@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #92

                              @ikuturso @nullpotential @mcc signing up for mastodon.social is not the worst thing you could do. setting up your own server and being subject to harassment by widely blocked servers you didn't know existed? the immediate response was to look for shared blocklists, but that just led to more conflict because again, how are you supposed to be aware of the years-long social dynamics of a space you literally just joined? the common refrain of "just use a different instance" was taken dismissively.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • lrhodes@merveilles.townL lrhodes@merveilles.town

                                @trwnh @mat @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer Yeah, my understanding a while back was that the canonical location is defined by reference to the DID address. The way, you can still have a canonical address even if the originating account shifts to a new address. That prevents the old PDS from retaining authority. But so much has changed since I firmed that understanding that I wasn't sure whether or not it had changed. (One would hope the procedures for determining canonicity wouldn't change.)

                                trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                trwnh@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #93

                                @lrhodes @mat @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer """fun""" fact btw: canonicity of at:// uri is different depending on whether you use the did or dns as the authority. so at://atproto.com has different properties than at://did:plc:ewvi7nxzyoun6zhxrhs64oiz -- the former will break if the dns handle ever changes, and the latter is supposed to be used whenever canonical references are needed. but guess which one gets exposed to user-facing stuff? that's right, did is backend, dns is frontend.

                                E 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.netE erincandescent@akko.erincandescent.net

                                  @mcc @trwnh @ikuturso @jrose But the problem is that did:plc by definition always points to Bluesky’s DID repo.

                                  trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  trwnh@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #94

                                  @erincandescent @ikuturso @mcc @jrose yep, did:plc is equivalent to did:web:plc.directory (which is equivalent to https://plc.directory)

                                  it's basically dns all over again, but in a different format (did documents instead of resource records). plc.directory is basically the authoritative nameserver.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                    If you sign up with https://blacksky.community you get:

                                    - Blacksky's "appview"/web frontend
                                    - Optionally, Blacksky's PDS
                                    - Blacksky's moderation layer (and you can optionally enable Bluesky's too)

                                    Almost-complete independence! What I'm not clear on is to whether, or to what degree Blacksky relies on Bluesky's "relay":

                                    fleeky@prsm.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fleeky@prsm.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fleeky@prsm.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #95

                                    @mcc nothing is stopping blue sky from blocking the h other two instances right ? Also is it not the case that black sky has an incomplete view of the entire atmosphere like only a few days so it's still dependent on blue sky due to the high cost of infra for being able to contain that entire view ?

                                    mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • fleeky@prsm.spaceF fleeky@prsm.space

                                      @mcc nothing is stopping blue sky from blocking the h other two instances right ? Also is it not the case that black sky has an incomplete view of the entire atmosphere like only a few days so it's still dependent on blue sky due to the high cost of infra for being able to contain that entire view ?

                                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mcc@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #96

                                      @fleeky 1. Correct
                                      2. I don't know

                                      fleeky@prsm.spaceF 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • trwnh@mastodon.socialT trwnh@mastodon.social

                                        @lrhodes @mat @mcc @alter_kaker @esoteric_programmer """fun""" fact btw: canonicity of at:// uri is different depending on whether you use the did or dns as the authority. so at://atproto.com has different properties than at://did:plc:ewvi7nxzyoun6zhxrhs64oiz -- the former will break if the dns handle ever changes, and the latter is supposed to be used whenever canonical references are needed. but guess which one gets exposed to user-facing stuff? that's right, did is backend, dns is frontend.

                                        E This user is from outside of this forum
                                        E This user is from outside of this forum
                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.club
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #97

                                        @trwnh @lrhodes @mat @mcc @alter_kaker I thought @user.domain.tld is just a way to point to @did:plc:blahblahblah, the same way we do with webfinger over here. Wouldn't this difference in the protocol make an impersonation attack more possible?

                                        trwnh@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.club

                                          @trwnh @lrhodes @mat @mcc @alter_kaker I thought @user.domain.tld is just a way to point to @did:plc:blahblahblah, the same way we do with webfinger over here. Wouldn't this difference in the protocol make an impersonation attack more possible?

                                          trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          trwnh@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          trwnh@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #98

                                          @esoteric_programmer @lrhodes @mat @mcc @alter_kaker you are *supposed* to "convert" the user.domain.tld to did:plc:blah, but you can still construct references against user.domain.tld. but you're not supposed to. but every user-facing component only shows you the user.domain.tld instead of the did:plc:blah, so if you're just copying from your address bar, you are going to get the "wrong" identifier most likely.

                                          it has the exact same properties as letting a dns name lapse and get reassigned.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups